SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willenheimer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willenheimer, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Implications of CIBIS III: A Commentary

Ronnie Willenheimer

Lund University, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden, ronnie.willenheimer{at}med.lu.se

Combined therapy with optimum doses of a beta-blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) is the mainstay for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). However, patients cannot be started on full doses of both drugs and treatment has to be initiated one way or the other. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) III was the first trial investigating the optimum sequence of initiating treatment of CHF, in terms of mortality and morbidity. CIBIS III compared randomised, open-label initial monotherapy with bisoprolol or enalapril for six months, followed by their combination for six to 24 months, in 1,010 patients at least 65 years of age, with stable, mildly or moderately symptomatic, systolic CHF. The two strategies were similarly efficacious in terms of the combined primary endpoint of mortality or all-cause hospitalisation, and showed similar safety. The bisoprolol-first approach showed a 28% lower mortality at the end of the monotherapy phase (p=0.24) and a 31% lower mortality at the end of the first year (p=0.06), but a 25% increase in worsening of CHF events (p=0.23). The main conclusion is that, CHF therapy may be started with bisoprolol or enalapril in patients like those in CIBIS III. However, it may be argued that the primary therapeutic goal in the early phase of CHF should be improved survival, whereas the long-term aim, achievable during combined therapy with optimum doses of several drugs, should be improved quality of life, physical function, morbidity and survival. In such case, the CIBIS III findings would tend to support starting CHF therapy with bisoprolol rather than enalapril in stable patients with mild or moderate symptoms.

Key Words: Beta-blocker • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor • Chronic heart failure • Therapy • Order of treatment initiation

Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, Vol. 6, No. 3, 115-120 (2005)
DOI: 10.3317/jraas.2005.017


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement